Cooperating for better care.

Affordable Care Act

Tag Archives

Training nurses in informatics

redcrossnurse

Herewith a look  at training for the mating of bedside nursing and healthcare informatics. 

Of course, expanding health-information technology is a goal of the Affordable Care Act and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  Lack of conformance,  albeit conformance achieved in clearly described stages, can result in serious penalties from the federal government.

Challenges include incentivizing healthcare employees to bridge gaps in their present software network to provide better care  and  trainig more healthcare workers as intermediaries in exchanging records,  whatever the delivery system.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Falling off the rolls

 

Some 13 percent of people who signed up for health-insurance coverage in 2015 under the Affordable Care Act have fallen off the rolls. The Obama administration attributes much of this decline to many people failing to pay their share of premiums. (Some probably got addicted to the “free”  — for them — care in emergency rooms.)

Things could get more exciting soon if the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Affordable Care Act only authorizes subsidies to help people pay for health insurance in states that established their own health-insurance exchanges. About 6.4 million could lose their premium subsidies if the Supremes rule against the subsidies.


Nervous GOP legislators split on tax credits

wildfire

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Acts’s healthcare subsidies coming in the next few weeks, congressional Republicans remain split over whether to extend the law’s tax credits if the court voids them in most of the country. Some GOP leaders fear a firestorm of public anger if the Republican-dominated court and the anti-ACA House are blamed f0r taking away what many patients have come to like and depend on.

If the Supremes throw out the credits, we’d guess that many anxious  Republican lawmakers will  vote to extend the credits to buy the GOP time  to enact a broader overhaul of health law the party has long opposed.


Healthcare fragmentation’s high cost

dollars

The Fiscal Times reports on a HealthAffairs analysis on the  vast administrative costs associated with the Affordable Care Act.

The analysis in HealthAffairs found that the ACA would add about $273.6 billion in administrative costs in  2014-22, including $172.2 billion in higher private insurance overhead.

David Himmelstein, M.D., and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., professors at the City University of New York School of Public Health and lecturers at Harvard Medical School, cite  rising enrollment in private plans, the law’s Medicaid expansion and the cost of setting up and running health-insurance exchanges.

Instead of the ACA, it would have cheaper, easier and more efficient to simply extend the traditional Medicare program to everyone — but that was seen as ideologically and politically impossible. So we have a system whose fragmentation and contradictory incentives and disincentives maximizes costs as each constituency demands its cut.

The latest estimate means about $1,375 in extra administrative costs per newly insured person per year, according to the report. That’s “over and above what would have been expected had the law not been enacted,” Dr. Himmelstein wrote on the Health Affairs blog.

 

 

 

 


Video: Why the CVS-Omnicare deal?

 

Video:  Bloomberg’s Cynthia Koons analyzes  CVS Health’s plan to buy Omnicare. Is it an outgrowth of the Affordable Care Act?


Fund sees 31 million ‘underinsured’

 

 

A study by the Commonwealth Fund says that 31 million Americans people with health coverage have out-of-pocket costs or deductibles so high that they are considered “underinsured,” making them generally unable to take advantage of their health benefits despite the Affordable Care Act.

Examining about 3,000 adults ages 19 to 64, the fund found 23 percent of to be underinsured. Most were covered by an employer-sponsored plan or a privately purchased plan.

 

In other words, we have a lot further to go in American health-insurance reform.

 

 

 


Are rules on doctor-owned hospitals too tough?

 

A U.S. House subcommittee is looking at whether rules for physician-owned hospitals should be lessened  because the rules may be stunting their growth.

The hearing Tuesday,  chaired by U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady (R.-Texas), was entitled “Improving Competition in Medicare: Removing Moratoria and Expanding Access,” participants. It  discussed a  rule  under the  Affordable Care Act that keeps physician-owned hospitals from expanding and keeps new physician-owned hospitals from treating Medicare and Medicaid patients.

“It is our responsibility to protect Medicare for today’s seniors and for future generations — increasing competition in the marketplace can help achieve that. We will continue to hold hearings on improving the payment system for hospitals and other healthcare providers over the course of this year and develop reforms that will help save Medicare for the long term,” Mr. Brady told the session.


Banned from Medicare but billing Medicaid

cardsharpers

“Card-sharpers by Candlelight,” by Feliks Peczarski.

Reuters notes that  the Affordable Care Act “explicitly requires that states suspend the billing privileges of most providers who have been ‘terminated’ or ‘revoked’ by another state or Medicare.

“But in an exclusive analysis of state and federal data, Reuters found that more than one in five of the thousands of doctors and other healthcare providers in the U.S. prohibited  {for various infractions] from billing Medicare are still able to bill state Medicaid programs.”

With millions of patients newly covered by Medicaid under the ACA, and wild differences in the program’s oversight between states, it’s hard to see how this problem won’t get worse.


No more low-hanging fruit?

low-hanginhg fruit

A JAMA study has found that a federal test program that stems from the Affordable Care Act involving physicians and hospitals slowed healthcare spending in Medicare coverage by hundreds of millions of dollars in 2012 and 2013 but savings were less in the second year.

Reuters reported that the study looked at beneficiaries in 32 Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), in which hospitals and physicians follow 33 quality and care standards for Medicare fee-for-service patients. In return they can receive part of any healthcare savings back from the government.

The savings were 4 percent in the first year but less than 1.5 percent in the second, compared with spending on beneficiaries in traditional Medicare fee-for-service.

The big question is, of course, whether it will much tougher to get hefty new savings over the next few years or whether new systems  and processes (including new technology) will make further efficiencies when those systems are fully integrated. Were the first-year savings simply low-hanging fruit?

New ACO incentive systems are in the pipeline.

One would suspect that some folks at JAMA might not like ACO’s at all because they would tend to reduce the revenues of physicians who have prospered greatly in the fee-for-service system now  under attack by private- and public-sector payers.


Opening up ACA mysteries

 

HealthAffairs looks at  important parts of the Affordable Care Act that have been little noticed although the  controversial law has been around for five years.

Among them are that many more people than you might think are eligible for special enrollment periods on health-insurance exchanges and that as many as 14 million children could become ineligible for insurance coverage by 2019.

 

 


Page 25 of 29First...242526...Last

Contact Info

info@cmg625.com

(617) 230-4965

Wellesley, Mass