Cooperating for better care.

Robert Whitcomb

Author Archives

The coding, fee-for-service cost disaster

 

Joe Flower, writing in Hospitals & Health Networks, discusses how code-based, fee-for-service medicine has driven U.S, medicine to be astronomically expensive.

He notes:

And he discusses how a cost-control scheme can drive costs up:

“{T}he coding system actually punished … efficiency and effectiveness. Under this system, we got paid for our inefficiencies, and even for our mistakes: Do-overs often would drop far more to the bottom line than the original procedure did.”


Video: Shared decision-making with Mayo

 

See this Mayo Clinic video about shared clinician-patient decision-making.

Among the questions: How much participation and decision making do patients  really want, and how can  physicians tell or, at least get an idea of, how  much they want?


3 systems move against low-volume procedures

 

U.S. News & World Report says:

Three of the nation’s top academic medical systems – Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Johns Hopkins Medicine and the University of Michigan – will  impose minimum-volume standards to bar their hospitals  from performing certain procedures “unless both the hospitals and their surgeons do them often enough to keep their skill level up.”

The move comes after  U.S. News  story showing that hospitals “that do small numbers of common procedures place patients at far greater risk than those that do lots of them.”


Hospital costs across America

 

Here’s the average daily hospital cost per inpatient in the 50 states.


It’s now easier to sue Feds for malpractice

vets

The U.S. Supreme Court has made it easier to sue the federal government for negligence, including medical malpractice at Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, in a case involving deadlines for filing lawsuits.

The 5-4 majority  held that such deadlines could be extended for plaintiffs who had either done their best to comply with them or had failed to obtain critical information before them, MedScape reported.

In one brief, the Paralyzed Veterans of America and other groups argued that, as an Associated Press story put it, “veterans unwittingly miss their deadlines for filing claims because the Department of Veterans Affairs has created a confusing process.”


Life after the SGR

 

Robert Doherty discusses how physicians should deal with the exit of the Sustainable Growth Rate and the arrival of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.

 


R.I. FQHC has big plans

 

Blackstone Valley Community Healthcare, a Rhode Island Federally Qualified Health Center, is buying Notre Dame Ambulatory Center  from Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, in another giant step in the creation of the first-ever Neighborhood Health Station in the state.

“The long-term vision for the building will be to create a place where 90 percent of the health and wellness needs of the community can be met,” Raymond Lavoie, executive director of Blackstone Valley, told ConvergenceRI.

 

 

 

 


Behind Aetna’s acquisition plans?

 

Forbes reports that the health insurance industry’s  shift away from paying for volume to paying for value may be behind Aetna’s rumored deal to acquire either Cigna or Humana.

Humana’s booming Medicare business makes it an attractive acquisition target for Aetna, which focuses more on employer-sponsored health plans that have less unit growth potential than Medicare or Medicaid plans. And Humana has considerable experience in the fee-for-value world, Aetna less so.

 

“The health insurance industry deal speculation primarily focusing on Aetna’s ambitions comes just as the government plans to shift a huge amount of Medicare dollars away from the traditional fee-for-service approach to medicine that is based on volume and to medicine based on value that is tied to outcomes, performance and quality of care provided. Humana administers a large book of Medicare business Aetna may be interested in and larger amounts of capital may be needed to managed it from either insurer,” Forbes said.


Guidance on using health technology

 

Roger Holstein, the chief executive of Healthgrades, a Web site that rates and provides information on physicians, dentists and hospitals, advises consumers, (and by implication, providers) about using technology in the brave new world of health technology.

He  tells The St. Louis Post Dispatch that says consumers can ensure better health outcomes by applying the same research to their medical providers as for life’s other decisions.

 

He discusses:

How to  connect people to the right physicians

How to  educate patients about their physicians and the health system as a whole.

The  role of transparency and data in healthcare.

The future of buying health insurance.

Dealing with the narrowing of provider networks.

 

 


A pitch for less screening

 

New American College of Physicians guidelines says that many patients “could be screened less often for certain cancers to minimize their risk of receiving unnecessary follow-up tests or treatment for tumors that are unlikely to become harmful,” Reuters reported.

Following these recommendations would obviously mean a considerable drop in income for some providers.

“Less frequent screening for some malignancies, as well as starting tests later in life and ending them earlier in old age, may make sense for some adults without a family history or other risk factors for cancer.”

“The notion of high-value screening is a sensible way for doctors and patients to decide whether a particular test for cancer makes sense,” Dr. Richard Schilsky, chief medical officer for the American Society of Clinical Oncology, told Reuters.

He wasn’t involved in the ACP recommendations.

“No screening test is perfect, and most people who get screened don’t have the disease. Most people who do have the disease won’t benefit from screening because the disease is so aggressive that they would have died anyway, or because it is so slow-growing they would never have symptoms,” Dr, Schilsky said.


Page 308 of 368First...307308309...Last

Contact Info

info@cmg625.com

(617) 230-4965

Wellesley, Mass