Sigmund Freud, M.D., died of oral cancer caused by cigar smoking.
* Building a dominant healthcare system for maximum pricing power.
* Applying the ”80/20 rule” to most opportunities, talent, revenues and cost areas. The rule basically means mean that 80 percent of your outcomes come from 20 percent of your inputs.
* Testing new areas but doubling down on winners.
* Embracing ownership of physician practices.
Of course, some of these ideas are recycled banalities — or just sense for sale at very high hourly rates.
”Healthfirst members who are dual eligibles for both Medicare and Medicaid and who are enrolled in the its CompleteCare Special Needs Plan will be targeted by New York-based eCaring, which will apply its data analysis and cloud-based monitoring software, by way of tablets.”
The Center for Healthcare Governance has looked at what it sees as the necessary new duties of hospital boards in context of the current vast changes in healthcare. In a nutshell, the survey said that hospital chief executives did not think that their boards were moving fast enough to keep up with the new demands.
The center says that in addition to the push to emphasize healthcare quality (as measured by outcomes) and fiscal fitness, boards need to learn more about physician-staff alignment and community health (which, of course, includes much more than medicine).
The center’s 2014 National Healthcare Governance Survey was based on information from chief executive officers and board chairs.
The survey found that chairs scored their boards higher than did the CEOs did in evaluating the boards’ pace in examining new governance models for possible adoption; having frank strategic discussions to understand what change in their organizations meant for new strategies; and developing strategies for transformational change.
She cites the for-profits’ talents for cutting costs and new marketing initiatives to drum up patient volume.
But nonprofit-hospital chains continue to sputter.
She writes:
“Our constant inability to address this shortage is also immutable, and it has been so for all the decades we could have used to train more primary care doctors.
“Whether by design or by happenstance, we are now working hard to reduce demand, and perceived need, for actual doctors in primary care, and at the same time, we are working equally hard, if not harder, to increase the soothing volume of cheap and inconsequential services which are considered part of primary care.”
Along the way, she also returns to the old, half-joking, half-serious comparison of primary care and Jiffy Lube.
Thomas Edison with his searchlight cart.
Here’s a discussion in JAMA of the value of transparency in physician payments.
This article in The New England Journal of Medicine looks at patient choice and equity in Sweden, where there’s universal healthcare but the decision-making is highly decentralized, with power given to county councils that ”own and operate almost all hospitals and a majority of primary care facilities.”
P0licies change with the varying preferences of center-right and center-left governments about such matters as pharmacy privatization, but a consensus remains that high-quality healthcare should be available to all.
(Video included in link.)
Lisa Suennen writes in MedCity News:
”I expect we are going to see a lot more collaborations between healthcare and consumer products companies like unlikely alliances {one between Disney and Eli Lilly} that go at the core of two of the most serious healthcare challenges: health literacy and behavior change.
”If we could ‘fix’ those two problems, I suspect that we could cut the costs of the healthcare system by at least a third by eliminating many of the medical errors, treatment compliance problems borne of lack of understanding and cultural medical miscues.”
”Healthcare companies had better co-opt those consumer brand companies into helping them communicate with consumers or they may just end up working for them.”