Cooperating for better care.

Uncategorized

Category Archives

‘Medical stewardship’ vs. overuse

 

Herewith a look in HealthAffairs at curbing treatment overuse of imaging, antibiotics and beyond via “medical stewardship”. Other areas of overuse include procedures in interventional cardiology, orthopedics, vascular surgery, endocrine and cancer surgery where there’s a lot of variation in  use.

The piece says “A structure for stewardship could be justified as part of patient safety and quality improvement. By improving appropriateness of care, patients would face less risk of medical harm and a lower burden of care (fewer tests and medications to remember).”


Kaiser to buy Group Health Cooperative

bigfish

Kaiser Permanente, the California integrated-delivery system with one of the largest U.S. health-insurance plans,  plans to buy the Seattle-based Group Health Cooperative.

Many hospitals, physician groups and health plans seek to expand and diversify to help manage their growing financial risk from new reimbursement contracts that penalize poor quality and high costs. 

“The entire healthcare environment is expanding from local geographies to regional geographies and then … national geographies,” Kit Kamholz, managing director at Kaufman Hall and an expert in healthcare transactions, told Modern Healthcare. Kaiser is moving “from being more of a regional player to more of a national player.”

The publication reported that “Acquiring Group Health would let Oakland, Calif.-based Kaiser to expand into an eighth market and absorb Group Health’s more than 590,000 members. Nearly four dozen primary-care and behavioral health clinics, four specialty medical centers and one hospital in Washington and northern Idaho would also be added to Kaiser Permanente’s $56.4 billion operations.”

Kaiser is also  reportedly considering acquistions in Michigan.

Kaiser CEO Bernard Tyson said of the Group Health move:

“As part of our ongoing operational improvement work and our efforts to improve the quality of healthcare, we regularly evaluate opportunities to engage with other healthcare organizations. This work can range from informal collaboration around a narrow scope to more broad, structured and cooperative affiliations. Our overall long-term goal is to make our integrated model of high-quality, affordable care and coverage even better, and available to more people, as part of our mission to improve the health of our communities.”

 

 

 


Review of the ‘Choosing Wisely’ campaign

owl

Here’s a review of the  successes and disappointments so far of the ABIM  Foundation’s “Choosing Wisely” campaign aimed at getting patients and clinicians to talk more thoroughly and honestly  with each other about medical, financial, psychological and other issues that should be addressed in healthcare decision-making. The aim is better care and tighter cost control.

It’s by Daniel Wolfson, M.D., of the ABIM Foundation, which is part of the American Board of Internal Medicine empire.

His remarks in a long HealthAffairs piece include:

Choosing Wisely has been criticized for focusing on conversations instead of measures and implementation. It has also been criticized by some who said the content of the lists of unnecessary tests and procedures compiled by various specialties do not address more challenging areas of overuse. These are valid concerns.”

And:

“Efforts to develop additional lists of wasteful tests and procedures are already happening at the grassroots level, such as the Journal of Hospital Medicine’s new series: Choosing Wisely: Things we do for no reason. Group practices have also begun these conversations. We welcome more and more communities to work together to discuss what unnecessary tests and procedures they may be ordering and performing.”

 

 


Insurers must provide solid data for value-based model

 

As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services accelerates the move  toward  a value-based payment model, its efforts depend upon receiving rigorously collected data from health insurers to improve care delivery, says CMS Acting Administrator Andy Slavitt, reports Health Data Management.

He emphasized that  payers should support providers in improving the entirety of their practices, or delivery-system reform won’t work.

Note that Blue Cross Blue Shield has launched a massive database to make information on healthcare quality and cost available to employers, members and provider partners.

Commercial health plans in the Affordable Care Act marketplace and in Medicare will be required to make data  for providers and patients available in machine-readable form.


Residents’ work-hour limits may be backfiring

stopwatch

As Slate notes,  “In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the nonprofit that oversees residency programs, followed New York’s lead and barred residents from working more than 80 hours a week or spending more than 24 straight hours on duty caring for patients. It also guaranteed them the relative luxury of one day off every week.”

“Yet by the time this new round of reforms was solidifying, researchers had already started to notice something discouraging: Although the 2003 rules seemed to have made life more bearable for residents — several papers found physicians were suffering less burnout—a pair of major studies concluded that they still weren’t improving patient outcomes. There were a few theories why, including the possibility that hospitals were simply ignoring the rules. But as Darshak Sanghavi explained in a lengthy 2011 New York Times Magazine article, many suspected another problem was at play: While doctors might have been better rested, the new rules prevented them from overseeing their patients’ care from start to finish. ”

“The surgical community in particular is concerned about this and feels duty hour restrictions have impaired continuity of care,”   Karl Bilimoria, M.D.,  a professor at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, told Slate, which paraphrased him as saying  that “young doctors find themselves forced to hand off patients in the middle of urgent situations—in the middle of an operation, for example, or while trying to stabilize them in the intensive care unit. Senior doctors, of course, get to stay on the case. But interns and older residents have to switch off, ”and it’s simply because their clock is up and they have to leave.”

Slate added that: {T}here are some signs that interns themselves may not be benefiting much from the latest changes. A 2013 study found that interns who started training after the 16-hour rule went into effect were statistically no less likely to experience depression and no more likely to feel a sense of well-being. They were also more likely to report feeling concerned about having made a serious medical error.”


4 biggest Arizona systems form lobbying group

 

Arizona’s four largest health systems — Banner Health, Dignity Health, HonorHealth and Tenet Healthcare Corp. — have formed an alliance, called Health System Alliance of Arizona, to advocate for public policy that represents the state’s healthcare industry.

The most interesting thing about the alliance is that none of the  four systems are part of the Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, the statewide association for health systems.


For a ‘value-management office’

 

This Harvard Business School article says that hospital executive suites need a “value-management office.”

The article says that such an office “can greatly enhance an institution’s ability to improve outcomes and costs across the enterprise. At a minimum, it can serve as a center of excellence to assist decentralized clinical units in outcomes and cost measurement and management, set priorities for continuous improvement projects, facilitate the creation of value-based payment models with insurers and employers, and ensure that new information technology platforms are aligned with the value agenda.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Patient ‘wins’ for this year

touchdown

Becker’s Hospital Review asks  hospital chief medical officers what they think are the biggest “wins’ for patients this year in their organizations and/or the sector as a whole.

 

 


Showing system ‘how to deal with new payer world’

 

applegate

Vineyards in Jackson County, Ore.  Jackson Care Connect serves many low-income agricultural workers.

It took considerable courage and enthusiasm three years ago to launch Jackson Care Connect (JCC), a Coordinated Care Organization in Oregon created to serve mostly low-income people on Medicaid.

In the past year, Cambridge Management Group (CMG) has participated in a nationally watched project to help JCC accelerate its mission to improve care and medical outcomes for its population while saving money as the U.S. healthcare system moves toward payment for value from fee for service.

Jackson Care Connect has brought together many organizations and other constituencies – some of them economic rivals of each other — to improve how it uses its limited resources.

A key part of Cambridge Management’s JCC engagement,  which included Bob Harrington, Marc Pierson, M.D.,  and Annie Merkle, was to study the individual parts of the healthcare-related environment in which Jackson Care Connect operates and then to explain, in part through mapping, the linkages among providers and a wide range of other community players — many not healthcare institutions per se — and the social determinants of health. CMG’s research is richly presented in graphics and a report.

(Biographical sketches of the CMG team may be found at this link to the “Professional Staff” page of CMG’s Web site.)

CMG had to understand the function of each part of the JCC universe before it could propose ways to make all players mesh their operations for the benefit of the entire population being served.

Cambridge Management suggested how JCC could best coordinate all these moving parts to meet the Triple Aim of improving the individual patient experience (including quality and satisfaction); improving the health of populations — of particular importance to an organization like Jackson Care Connect — and cutting the per-capita cost of healthcare.

Informing all this work has been the need to address the social determinants of health (which experts consider account for up to 90 percent of health, with direct contact with the healthcare system accounting for the rest). These determinants include, among many other factors, family income, family stability or lack thereof, environment, transportation and education.

Dr. Pierson, we should note, is a former emergency physician and hospital executive who is longtime expert on the social determinants of health and how to reform the healthcare system to address them. His work on addressing these determinants of health in Washington State has drawn national attention.

Jackson Care Connect’s chief executive, Jennifer Lind, said that the CMG team found “areas where things didn’t work,’’ helped determine where operations and attitudes could be most quickly improved, and then facilitated more efficient “interactions between the moving parts.’’

“Cambridge Management broke down what everyone was doing and then convened different constituencies together to try to fulfill larger vision. They worked with us to align the different groups to create a community vision of improving outcomes and capturing savings – not just adding more services upstream.’’

“Bob and Marc as conveners got excitement for change going in the various groups by helping them see what they could do better individually and, especially, together.’’

Cambridge Management’s engagement with JCC — informed by CMG’s decades of working with physicians to align their interests and work with their institutions — sparked new thinking about how clinicians and others could make the new value-based payment systems work better. Ms. Lind said that “clinicians, especially, were inspired by Bob {Harrington} and Marc {Pierson} to help develop new initiatives.’’ These included, Ms. Lind said, “improving care transitions between hospitals and nursing homes and between primary-care physicians and specialists.’’

She noted the complexity of the move to fee for value. “We asked people to do really complex stuff. Some people just don’t like being thrown into complex projects.’

But of course transforming American healthcare is complex stuff: The U.S. system is by far the world’s most complicated and among the most inefficient.

Further, she said, improving Medicaid at the provider and user end is particularly difficult because it doesn’t have the much more powerful economic and political constituencies of Medicare and private insurers. Further, there’s no central authority with statutory power to impose the sort of coordination that Jackson Care Connect and similar regional groups seek to help their populations.

Still, that JCC’s initiatives so far have shown all its constituencies the value of care coordination, and that a wide range of important constituencies are represented on its board, should over time increase its ability to implement new clinical and payment models.

Ms. Lind said: “With Cambridge Management’s help, we’ve been showing the system how to deal with the new payer world.’’

By explaining the linkages through a “system and process lens,’’ CMG helped them make order out of the seeming “chaos’’ of the community health environment.

Here’s a poster describing the linkages of Jackson County’s healthcare entities and related information: OHA Summit 2015 Jackson Poster am.ppt (PowerPoint file will download).

A report, with graphics, on the findings and recommendations of the CMG engagement is linked here (PDF) and appendix here. (PDF)

Read the description by Marc Pierson, M.D., of Cambridge Management Group’s convening and mapping process.


An Ore. county maps its way out of healthcare ‘chaos’

Leaders from four of Jackson County, Oregon’s health institutions asked Cambridge Management Group (CMG) to help them formalize a community-wide collaborative approach to health-system improvement. Before starting, the sponsors rated the chances of success at “less than 50 percent”. Upon hearing this assessment, Marc Pierson. M.D., a member of the CMG team, pointed out that the strength and duration of leaders’ commitment would trump probability projections.

The CMG team  also included Bob Harrington and Annie Merkle. (Biographical sketches of all CMG staff members may be found at this link to the CMG Web site’s “Professional Staff” page.)

Participation and commitment grew as members of 13 institutions, along with 6 patients, documented the key parts of their county’s healthcare system. As they went along, they noted where and how they could improve the connections among their organizations—for stronger operational efficiencies as well as to better serve their shared patients.

These collaborating clinicians, administrators and patients developed a clearer understanding of the opportunities to work together to improve patients’ journeys among emergency rooms, inpatient hospitals, post-acute outpatient care and social-service agencies. It became clear to all that these improvements would help achieve the “Triple Aim’’ goals — better care, lower cost and improved care experience.

In the second joint meeting they prioritized a set of improvements and defined the criteria for measuring success. The collaborative two-day process of mapping the county’s healthcare-related parts and connections, priority-setting and defining specific improvement programs was a new experience. But as participants saw the emerging picture and practical opportunities, they became optimistic and committed to proceed with improving their institutional interactions. “People were delighted when they saw the practical work they could do together,’’ Dr. Pierson said.

Jackson Care Connect, a not-for-profit regional insurance organization, thus took the opportunity to invest some of the savings from the preceding year’s improvements (One such improvement was to improve the efficiency of “handoffs’’ – when patients move from one healthcare institution or clinician to the next).

This community program began with in-depth listening by CMG to the perspectives of institutional stakeholders and patients who would be participating in the system mapping and program definition. Midway through the project, 30 institutional leaders and 6 patients met for a day to map the community’s overall system and note the key linkages and interactions that support patients and institutional operations. This information was organized, shared, clarified and used to define seven initial system-improvement programs.

By explaining the linkages through a “system and process lens,’’ CMG helped them make order out of the seeming “chaos’’ of the community health environment.

Here’s a poster describing the linkages of Jackson County’s healthcare entities and related information: OHA Summit 2015 Jackson Poster am.ppt (PowerPoint file will download).

A report, with graphics, on the findings and recommendations of the CMG engagement is linked here (PDF) and appendix here. (PDF)

For  a look at this ambitious project by  Jennifer Lind,  Jackson Care Connect’s chief executive, hit this link

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Page 216 of 369First...215216217...Last

Contact Info

info@cmg625.com

(617) 230-4965

Wellesley, Mass